<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel><title>strategy | Hugo Ferreira</title>
    <link>https://hugo.ferreira.cc/tags/strategy/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Strategy by Hugo Ferreira</description>
    
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.124.1</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>2000–2024 by Hugo Ferreira · CC BY 4.0</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2025 10:06:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://hugo.ferreira.cc/tags/strategy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>🔗 The perfect pricing model doesn&#39;t exist</title>
      <link>https://hugo.ferreira.cc/perfect-pricing-model/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2025 10:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://hugo.ferreira.cc/perfect-pricing-model/</guid>
      <description>The perfect pricing model doesn&amp;rsquo;t exist - by Matt Hodges
You&amp;rsquo;ll never be done
…
At the end of the day, there&amp;rsquo;s no silver bullet when it comes to pricing. There are just many things you can and should probably test. Be ready to make trade-offs – whether that’s knowingly leaving money on the table or being OK with fewer customers who pay you more.
Make peace with the fact that your pricing will never be perfect.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://wrap-text.equals.com/p/the-perfect-pricing-model">The perfect pricing model doesn&rsquo;t exist - by Matt Hodges</a></p>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>You&rsquo;ll never be done</strong></p>
<p>…</p>
<p>At the end of the day, there&rsquo;s no silver bullet when it comes to pricing. There are just many things you can and should probably test. Be ready to make trade-offs – whether that’s knowingly leaving money on the table or being OK with fewer customers who pay you more.</p>
<p>Make peace with the fact that your pricing will never be perfect.</p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>So, what is pricing (+ packaging) anyway?</strong></p>
<p>… align on what you mean when you use certain words. So, <em>pricing</em> and <em>packaging</em>. Two words. Two sides of the same coin.</p>
<p>💰 <strong>Pricing</strong>: How, and how much, customers pay</p>
<p>📦 <strong>Packaging</strong>: How and what customers can buy</p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>Pricing is a strategy</strong></p>
<p>If you treat pricing and packaging as a strategy and not just a box you need to tick, it can create step changes in growth for your company.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>See also Anthony Pierri&rsquo;s post on LinkedIn: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6982730520686194688/">Pricing models for product-led growth</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>📋 Ask “How?”</title>
      <link>https://hugo.ferreira.cc/ask-how/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2024 12:34:56 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://hugo.ferreira.cc/ask-how/</guid>
      <description>Sharing more widely something that came up in a sketching session — a simple mnemonic for coming up with small / recurrent actions and avoid ending with generic goals that aren’t actionable:
Tip
Ask “how?” repeatedly until it it becomes silly 🙂
For example, if the initial thing I come up with is…
Understand better the inner working of this particular thing
Asking “how?” makes it clear that something is missing; so it becomes…</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sharing more widely something that came up in a sketching session — a simple <strong>mnemonic</strong> for coming up with <strong>small / recurrent actions</strong> and avoid ending with generic goals that aren’t actionable:</p>
<style type="text/css">
    .notice {
        --root-color: #444;
        --root-background: #eff;
        --title-color: #fff;
        --title-background: #7bd;
        --warning-title: #c33;
        --warning-content: #fee;
        --info-title: #fb7;
        --info-content: #fec;
        --note-title: #6be;
        --note-content: #e7f2fa;
        --tip-title: #5a5;
        --tip-content: #efe;
    }

    @media (prefers-color-scheme:dark) {
        .notice {
            --root-color: #ddd;
            --root-background: #eff;
            --title-color: #fff;
            --title-background: #7bd;
            --warning-title: #800;
            --warning-content: #400;
            --info-title: #a50;
            --info-content: #420;
            --note-title: #069;
            --note-content: #023;
            --tip-title: #363;
            --tip-content: #121;
        }
    }

    body.dark .notice, [data-theme="dark"] .notice {
        --root-color: #ddd;
        --root-background: #eff;
        --title-color: #fff;
        --title-background: #7bd;
        --warning-title: #800;
        --warning-content: #400;
        --info-title: #a50;
        --info-content: #420;
        --note-title: #069;
        --note-content: #023;
        --tip-title: #363;
        --tip-content: #121;
    }

    .notice {
        padding: 18px;
        line-height: 24px;
        margin-bottom: 24px;
        border-radius: 4px;
        color: var(--root-color);
        background: var(--root-background);
    }

    .notice p:last-child {
        margin-bottom: 0;
    }

    .notice-title {
        margin: -18px -18px 12px;
        padding: 4px 18px;
        border-radius: 4px 4px 0 0;
        font-weight: 700;
        color: var(--title-color);
        background: var(--title-background);
    }

    .notice.warning .notice-title {
        background: var(--warning-title);
    }

    .notice.warning {
        background: var(--warning-content);
    }

    .notice.info .notice-title {
        background: var(--info-title);
    }

    .notice.info {
        background: var(--info-content);
    }

    .notice.note .notice-title {
        background: var(--note-title);
    }

    .notice.note {
        background: var(--note-content);
    }

    .notice.tip .notice-title {
        background: var(--tip-title);
    }

    .notice.tip {
        background: var(--tip-content);
    }

    .icon-notice {
        display: inline-flex;
        align-self: center;
        margin-right: 8px;
    }

    .icon-notice img, .icon-notice svg {
        height: 1em;
        width: 1em;
        fill: currentColor;
    }

    .icon-notice img, .icon-notice.baseline svg {
        top: .125em;
        position: relative;
    }
</style><div class="notice tip" >
    <p class="notice-title">
        <span class="icon-notice baseline">
            <svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" height="20" viewBox="0 -960 960 960" width="20"><path d="m429-336 238-237-51-51-187 186-85-84-51 51 136 135Zm51 240q-79 0-149-30t-122.5-82.5Q156-261 126-331T96-480q0-80 30-149.5t82.5-122Q261-804 331-834t149-30q80 0 149.5 30t122 82.5Q804-699 834-629.5T864-480q0 79-30 149t-82.5 122.5Q699-156 629.5-126T480-96Z"/></svg>
        </span>Tip</p><p><strong>Ask “how?” repeatedly until it it becomes silly</strong> 🙂</p></div>

<p>For example, if the initial thing I come up with is…</p>
<blockquote>
<p><em>Understand better the inner working of this particular thing</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Asking <strong>“how?”</strong> makes it clear that something is missing; so it becomes…</p>
<blockquote>
<p><em>Ask John and Jane about the inner working of this particular thing</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Again, asking <strong>“how?”</strong> still indicates that there’s some room for more detail…</p>
<blockquote>
<ul>
<li>Ask John in our next 1-on-1 about the inner working of this particular thing</li>
<li>Ping Jane on Slack if there’s any documentation about the inner working of this particular thing</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>Now asking <strong>“how?”</strong> in any of these two is just silly (they&rsquo;re self-explanatory). So we’re done here. We have now 2 new concrete small actions to take!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>📜 Plans vs. Planning</title>
      <link>https://hugo.ferreira.cc/plans-vs-planning/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 09:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://hugo.ferreira.cc/plans-vs-planning/</guid>
      <description>Plans are worthless, but planning is everything.
— Dwight Eisenhower
Quote Investigator
The details of a plan which was designed years in advance are often incorrect, but the planning process demands the thorough exploration of options and contingences. The knowledge gained during this probing is crucial to the selection of appropriate actions as future events unfold.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>Plans are worthless, but planning is everything.</p>
<p>— Dwight Eisenhower</p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
<p><a href="https://quoteinvestigator.com/2017/11/18/planning/">Quote Investigator</a></p>
<blockquote>
<p>The details of a plan which was designed years in advance are often incorrect, but the planning process demands the thorough exploration of options and contingences. The knowledge gained during this probing is crucial to the selection of appropriate actions as future events unfold.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>🔗 Simple suggestions for technology investment</title>
      <link>https://hugo.ferreira.cc/technology-investment/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2024 07:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://hugo.ferreira.cc/technology-investment/</guid>
      <description>Simple suggestions for technology investment. | by swardley | Apr, 2024 | Medium
Wardley’s unproven method of thinking about investment.
Step 1: Ignore the consultants, business gurus and analyst reports.
Step 2: Gather some actual practitioners.
Step 3: Ask them what matters.
Step 4: Categorise the list.
Step 5: Map the perspectives [Parallel]
Step 6: Identify areas of investment. [Parallel]
Step 7: Aggregation and comparison.
TL;DR
Be clear on your purpose.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://swardley.medium.com/simple-suggestions-for-technology-investment-540f6d26fc16">Simple suggestions for technology investment. | by swardley | Apr, 2024 | Medium</a></p>
<blockquote>
<p>Wardley’s unproven method of thinking about investment.</p>
<p>Step 1: Ignore the consultants, business gurus and analyst reports.</p>
<p>Step 2: Gather some actual practitioners.</p>
<p>Step 3: Ask them what matters.</p>
<p>Step 4: Categorise the list.</p>
<p>Step 5: Map the perspectives [Parallel]</p>
<p>Step 6: Identify areas of investment. [Parallel]</p>
<p>Step 7: Aggregation and comparison.</p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
<blockquote>
<p>TL;DR</p>
<ol>
<li>Be clear on your purpose.</li>
<li>Understand the landscape.</li>
<li>Realise that the landscape changes.</li>
<li>Analysts are a good signal for the market but that may not be where you should invest.</li>
<li>Diversity matters.</li>
</ol>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>🔗 Making a Business Case for Accessibility in Small and Large Publishing Organisations</title>
      <link>https://hugo.ferreira.cc/accessibility-business-case/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2024 18:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://hugo.ferreira.cc/accessibility-business-case/</guid>
      <description>Show Me the Money: Making a Business Case for Accessibility in Small and Large Publishing Organisations | BookMachine
DON’T: Say it’ll increase sales
DO: Talk about compliance
DON’T: Pretend to be a lawyer
DO: Speak to a lawyer
DON’T: Promise AI will fix everything
DO: Explore vendor options
DON’T: Narrow the conversation solely to print disability
DO: Talk about readiness and future-proofing
DO: Talk to experts</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookmachine.org/2024/04/08/show-me-the-money-making-a-business-case-for-accessibility-in-small-and-large-publishing-organisations/">Show Me the Money: Making a Business Case for Accessibility in Small and Large Publishing Organisations | BookMachine</a></p>
<blockquote>
<p>DON’T: Say it’ll increase sales</p>
<p>DO: Talk about compliance</p>
<p>DON’T: Pretend to be a lawyer</p>
<p>DO: Speak to a lawyer</p>
<p>DON’T: Promise AI will fix everything</p>
<p>DO: Explore vendor options</p>
<p>DON’T: Narrow the conversation solely to print disability</p>
<p>DO: Talk about readiness and future-proofing</p>
<p>DO: Talk to experts</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>🔗 Lean Value Tree</title>
      <link>https://hugo.ferreira.cc/lean-value-tree/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 23:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://hugo.ferreira.cc/lean-value-tree/</guid>
      <description>Lean Value Tree | Open Practice Library
The LVT follows a Top-Down framework: Vision &amp;gt; Strategic Goals &amp;gt; Bets &amp;gt; Initiatives. A company&amp;rsquo;s vision is broken down into a number of strategic goals, which are then defined into a number of bets, out of which value streams and initiatives with specific, targeted outcomes drive achievement from the bottom up.
Strategic layer
Ambitious Mission — What is our destination as an organisation?</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://openpracticelibrary.com/practice/lean-value-tree/">Lean Value Tree | Open Practice Library</a></p>
<blockquote>
<p>The LVT follows a Top-Down framework: <strong>Vision</strong> &gt; <strong>Strategic Goals</strong> &gt; <strong>Bets</strong> &gt; <strong>Initiatives</strong>. A company&rsquo;s vision is broken down into a number of strategic goals, which are then defined into a number of bets, out of which value streams and initiatives with specific, targeted outcomes drive achievement from the bottom up.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><img loading="lazy" src="https://openpracticelibrary.com/images/lean-value-tree-2.jpg" alt="a tree with “ambitious mission” at the top and sub nodes “strategic goal”, then “strategic bet”, then “promise of value”"  />
</p>
<blockquote>
<p><em>Strategic layer</em></p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Ambitious Mission</strong> — What is our destination as an organisation?</li>
<li><strong>Strategic Goal</strong> — What does the organisation need to achieve to get there?</li>
<li><strong>Strategic Bet</strong> — What strategies are we betting to achieve the goal?</li>
</ol>
<p><em>Tactical Initiatives</em></p>
<ol start="4">
<li><strong>Promise of Value</strong> — What value are we offering to customers to help us do that?</li>
<li><strong>Promise of Delivery</strong> — How much are we investing?</li>
</ol>
</blockquote>
<p>See also:</p>
<ol>
<li><a href="https://rolandbutler.medium.com/what-is-the-lean-value-tree-e90d06328f09">What is The Lean Value Tree | by Product Stories &amp; Observations | Medium</a></li>
<li><a href="https://rolandbutler.medium.com/solving-customer-problems-first-with-the-lean-value-tree-6da51f15ad49">How To Get Buy-In For A New Product Strategy That Focuses On Customer Problems | by Product Stories &amp; Observations | Medium</a></li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>📺 A plan is not a strategy</title>
      <link>https://hugo.ferreira.cc/plan-is-not-strategy/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 23:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://hugo.ferreira.cc/plan-is-not-strategy/</guid>
      <description>A Plan Is Not a Strategy - YouTube
Strategic ≠ Planning
What most “strategic planning” is in the world of business has nothing to do with strategy. It’s got the word, but it’s not. It’s a set of activities that the company says it‘s going to do.
… but the results of all of those are not going to make the company happy, because they didn&amp;rsquo;t have a strategy.
What’s a strategy?</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iuYlGRnC7J8">A Plan Is Not a Strategy - YouTube</a></p>

<div style="position: relative; padding-bottom: 56.25%; height: 0; overflow: hidden;">
  <iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/iuYlGRnC7J8?rel=0" style="position: absolute; top: 0; left: 0; width: 100%; height: 100%; border:0;" allowfullscreen title="A Plan Is Not a Strategy"></iframe>
</div>

<blockquote>
<p><strong>Strategic ≠ Planning</strong></p>
<p><em>What most “strategic planning” is in the world of business has nothing to do with strategy. It’s got the word, but it’s not. It’s a set of activities that the company says it‘s going to do.</em></p>
<p><em>… but the results of all of those are not going to make the company happy, because they didn&rsquo;t have a strategy.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>What’s a strategy?</strong></p>
<p>strat-e-gy<br>
<em>noun</em><br>
An integrative set of choices that positions you on a playing field of your choice in a way that you win.</p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
<blockquote>
<p>Strategy has a <strong>theory</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><em>Here’s why we should be on this playing field, not this other one</em></li>
<li><em>Here’s how we’re going to be better than anybody else at serving the customers on that playing field</em></li>
<li>A strategic theory <strong>must be coherent and doable.</strong></li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<hr>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>Planning</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>You control costs.</li>
<li>You are the customer.</li>
<li>It’s comfortable. 🙂</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Strategy</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Actual customers are the customers.</li>
<li>You don‘t control them.</li>
<li>You don’t control revenues. 😬</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<hr>
<blockquote>
<p><em>[Strategy] … means putting yourself out and saying, “here’s what we believe will happen. We can’t prove it in advance, we can’t guarantee it, but this is what we want to have happen, and that we believe will happen.”</em></p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
<blockquote>
<p>Avoid the “planning trap”:</p>
<ul>
<li>Accept angst. 😬
<ul>
<li><em>You cannot prove in advance that your strategy is going to succeed</em></li>
<li><em>In strategy, you have to say, “if our theory is right, this will position us in an excellent way”</em></li>
<li>Not knowing for sure <strong>isn’t bad management.</strong> <strong>It‘s great leadership.</strong></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Lay out the logic. Then tweak.
<ul>
<li><em>If something that you say is in the logic that would have to be true for this to work is not working out quite the way you hoped, it’ll allow you to tweak your strategy</em></li>
<li><em>Strategy is a journey. What you want to have is a mechanism for tweaking it, honing it, and refining it so it gets better and better</em></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Keep it short—ideally 1 page.
<ul>
<li><em>Here’s where we’re choosing to play …</em></li>
<li><em>Here’s how we’re choosing to win …</em></li>
<li><em>Here are the capabilities we need to have in place …</em></li>
<li><em>Here are the management systems …</em></li>
<li><em>… and that’s why it‘s going to achieve this goal/aspiration we have.</em></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>📜 Simple tips for managing any project</title>
      <link>https://hugo.ferreira.cc/map-vs-graph/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2024 20:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://hugo.ferreira.cc/map-vs-graph/</guid>
      <description>The distinction between a map and a graph is that in the map, the space has meaning.
…
Almost everything you’ve ever seen in business that calls itself a map, is instead a graph: mind maps are mind graphs, business process maps are business process graphs, etc. What gives space meaning is the anchor … combined with the position of pieces … and consistency of movement …
— Simon Wardley in Simple tips for managing any project</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>The distinction between a map and a graph is that in the map, the space has meaning.</p>
<p>…</p>
<p>Almost everything you’ve ever seen in business that calls itself a map, is instead a graph: mind maps are mind graphs, business process maps are business process graphs, etc. What gives space meaning is the anchor … combined with the position of pieces … and consistency of movement …</p>
<p>— Simon Wardley in <cite><a href="https://swardley.medium.com/simple-tips-for-managing-any-project-b9fc674b93b1#3a20">Simple tips for managing any project</a></cite></p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>🔗 The exponential horn of testing</title>
      <link>https://hugo.ferreira.cc/exponential-horn/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2023 21:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://hugo.ferreira.cc/exponential-horn/</guid>
      <description>The exponential horn of testing · GitHub
The actual model that more closely resembles what we need should have the bare minimum of E2E tests, quite a number of service tests and the vast majority should be unit tests.
Exponential model: x = 10^hy
So if the height h goes from 1 to 2 to 3 then we have 1 E2E test to 100 service tests to 10,000 unit tests.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://gist.github.com/sleepyfox/cfa6bab8e3d46b3cd7caef25e77c5435">The exponential horn of testing · GitHub</a></p>
<blockquote>
<p>The actual model that more closely resembles what we need should have the bare minimum of E2E tests, quite a number of service tests and the vast majority should be unit tests.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Exponential model: x = 10^hy</p>
</blockquote>
<p>So if the height h goes from 1 to 2 to 3 then we have 1 E2E test to 100 service tests to 10,000 unit tests.</p>
<p>There is a physical object which has these properties, it is called an <a href="https://robinthefog.com/tag/exponential-horn/">exponential horn</a>.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>💭 From Chaos to Strategy: Embracing Firefighting at Work</title>
      <link>https://hugo.ferreira.cc/firefighting/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2023 22:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://hugo.ferreira.cc/firefighting/</guid>
      <description>We use the analogy of firefighting when people handle unexpected problems at work. Instead of reacting in a chaotic manner like civilians, adopt the strategic approach of trained firefighters. This involves having a plan, clarifying roles, training people and practicing together. Doing so, we can create a better culture of preparedness in our companies.</description>
        
        
        <enclosure url="https://hugo.ferreira.cc/firefighting/unsplash-firefighter.jpg" length="2638464" type="image/jpeg" />
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We’ve all heard people say they&rsquo;re in “firefighting mode” or “putting out fires” at work. They mean they’re dealing with unexpected problems and everything feels chaotic. But have you ever thought about <em>why</em> we use the analogy of firefighting for this kind of scenario?</p>
<p>Picture a real life fire. People feel confused, scared, and don&rsquo;t know what to do. They’re stressed and drop everything, scrambling around to deal with the emergency. They disperse their focus and their actions are erratic. Chaos is all around.</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" src="teamwork-chaos.webp" alt="A man standing in an office with a fire in his hand, a woman running on top of a ostrich, a man on top of a desk, and people scrambling everywhere"  />
</p>
<p><em><a href="https://media.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPTc5MGI3NjExODY4OGIxZTZlNmE1NDgxMTg1NDk0YTY1ZTJiZDZhNGI3ODUyOTMxOSZjdD1n/ZD8ZjehSsLDZQRKJjJ/giphy.gif">Source</a></em></p>
<p>As you can imagine, I don‘t think this is how we should react. What might surprise you is that I don’t think the analogy is wrong. I’d argue though, that we should embrace it even further.</p>
<h2 id="even-firefighting-needs-a-strategy">Even firefighting needs a strategy</h2>
<p><strong>Trained firefighters</strong> make up another crucial group of people in firefighting. Their <em>actions</em> and <em>attitudes</em> are completely different from those described above:</p>
<ul>
<li>They have a well thought out <strong>strategy</strong> for tackling fires, which they adjust to the reality on the ground</li>
<li>They have pre-established <strong>roles</strong> and <strong>communication</strong> lines, so everyone knows what to do</li>
<li>They follow <strong>safety rules</strong> of engagement based on their learnings from past emergencies</li>
<li>They <strong>train</strong> together, in controlled environments simulating reality, to improve their coordination</li>
</ul>
<p>With this, they are ready to handle emergencies with calm and expertise. When fires do occur, they feel “familiar”. Even considering the natural levels of stress and adrenaline involved in these situations.</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" src="teamwork-order.gif" alt="A group of firefighters coordinating together to pass along buckets of water to the top of a ladder"  />
</p>
<p><em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/shorts/UQLUP6PwGRk">Source</a></em></p>
<p>Consider the case of forest fires and how trained firefighters behave when they’re on the scene:</p>
<ul>
<li>Headquarters coordinates efforts based on constant reports from the field</li>
<li>Coordination teams choose where to best deploy their people and physical resources</li>
<li>They take changing context into account (e.g. weather and wind forecasts) to decide which fire fronts to attack first</li>
<li>At times, they even decide which areas to let burn to create a natural barrier for other advancing fires</li>
</ul>
<hr>
<p>So, why can&rsquo;t we operate in a similar way in our companies? Why are we in constant in firefighting mode, reacting to emergencies as they arise?</p>
<p>We can choose to look at “firefighting” in a strategic way. We can seek to act like “trained firefighters”, rather than in a chaotic way like “civilians”:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Have a plan</strong> in place for handling unexpected problems</li>
<li>Make sure people <strong>understand their role</strong> in responding to unexpected challenges</li>
<li><strong>Train</strong> people on <strong>how to respond</strong> to crises in a calm and efficient manner</li>
<li><strong>Practice</strong> how to <strong>work together</strong> to find solutions in emergencies</li>
</ul>
<p>This way we can create a better culture of preparedness in our companies. Like trained firefighters, we can be ready to handle whatever challenges come our way.</p>
<p>So, the next time you find yourself in firefighting mode at work, remember that you have a choice. Don’t react in a chaotic manner, like a civilian in a fire. <strong>Be strategic like a trained firefighter.</strong></p>
<hr>
<details>
<summary>Shared to…</summary>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/hugocf_from-chaos-to-strategy-embracing-firefighting-activity-7048651523198754817-ZODQ">LinkedIn</a></li>
<li><a href="https://mastodon.online/@hugocf/110142785028504109">Mastodon</a></li>
<li><a href="https://hugocf.medium.com/from-chaos-to-strategy-embracing-firefighting-at-work-1ec65a6be852">Medium</a></li>
<li><a href="https://twitter.com/hugocf/status/1642784438873407489">Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
<p>🔒 <em>(groups)</em></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://ios.slack.com/archives/C0721L3CL/p1680511769840369">iOS PT Slack</a></li>
<li><a href="https://sa-il.slack.com/archives/CQ32FU1SR/p1680539980852139">SA-IL Slack</a></li>
<li><a href="https://t.me/c/1363309933/8513">Telegram</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>🏞 (image)</title>
      <link>https://hugo.ferreira.cc/part-1-why-microsofts-reorganization-is-a-bad/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 07:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://hugo.ferreira.cc/part-1-why-microsofts-reorganization-is-a-bad/</guid>
      <description>Part 1: Why Microsoft&amp;rsquo;s reorganization is a bad idea
Part 2: The uncanny valley of a functional organization
Part 3: Services, Not Devices is the best way forward for Microsoft
(via stratēchery by Ben Thompson )</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<figure>
<a
href="https://hugo.ferreira.cc/part-1-why-microsofts-reorganization-is-a-bad/attachment/421/"
rel="attachment"><img
src="tumblr_mqe0ea2Nl31qz82meo1_1280-150x150.jpg"
width="150" height="150" /></a></figure>
<figure>
<a
href="https://hugo.ferreira.cc/part-1-why-microsofts-reorganization-is-a-bad/attachment/422/"
rel="attachment"><img
src="tumblr_mqe0ea2Nl31qz82meo2_1280-150x150.jpg"
width="150" height="150" /></a></figure>
<figure>
<a
href="https://hugo.ferreira.cc/part-1-why-microsofts-reorganization-is-a-bad/attachment/423/"
rel="attachment"><img
src="tumblr_mqe0ea2Nl31qz82meo4_1280-150x150.jpg"
width="150" height="150" /></a></figure>
<figure>
<a
href="https://hugo.ferreira.cc/part-1-why-microsofts-reorganization-is-a-bad/attachment/424/"
rel="attachment"><img
src="tumblr_mqe0ea2Nl31qz82meo3_1280-150x150.jpg"
width="150" height="150" /></a></figure>
<figure>
<a
href="https://hugo.ferreira.cc/part-1-why-microsofts-reorganization-is-a-bad/attachment/425/"
rel="attachment"><img
src="tumblr_mqe0ea2Nl31qz82meo5_1280-150x150.jpg"
width="150" height="150" /></a></figure>
<p>Part 1: <a href="http://stratechery.com/2013/why-microsofts-reorganization-is-a-bad-idea/">Why Microsoft&rsquo;s reorganization is a bad
idea</a></p>
<p>Part 2: <a href="http://stratechery.com/2013/the-uncanny-valley-of-a-functional-organization/">The uncanny valley of a functional
organization</a></p>
<p>Part 3: <a href="http://stratechery.com/2013/services-not-devices/">Services, Not Devices is the best way forward for
Microsoft</a></p>
<p><em>(via <a href="http://stratechery.com">stratēchery by Ben Thompson</a> )</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>🔗 How to Evaluate a (paid) iPhone App Idea -- Tony Wright&#39;s Startup Front-End</title>
      <link>https://hugo.ferreira.cc/how-to-evaluate-a-paid-iphone-app-idea-tony/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 07:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://hugo.ferreira.cc/how-to-evaluate-a-paid-iphone-app-idea-tony/</guid>
      <description>How to Evaluate a (paid) iPhone App Idea &amp;ndash; Tony Wright&amp;rsquo;s Startup Front-End
So, should you launch a paid app?
Maybe.
Every entrepreneur is different. If you want to build a big/impactful business, it&amp;rsquo;s not the right path (&amp;hellip;). If what you want is a bootstrapped freedom-from-employment effort or are passionate about an idea that&amp;rsquo;s a lousy fit for in-app purchases, paid apps are a great path.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.tonywright.com/2012/how-to-evaluate-a-paid-iphone-app-idea/">How to Evaluate a (paid) iPhone App Idea &ndash; Tony Wright&rsquo;s Startup
Front-End</a></p>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>So, should you launch a paid app?</strong></p>
<p>Maybe.</p>
<p>Every entrepreneur is different. If you want to build a big/impactful
business, it&rsquo;s not the right path (&hellip;). If what you want is a
bootstrapped freedom-from-employment effort or are passionate about an
idea that&rsquo;s a lousy fit for in-app purchases, paid apps are a great
path.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
